Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix bug in ActiveIssueDiscoverer with condition member names #5744

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 3, 2020

Conversation

akoeplinger
Copy link
Member

In #5376 the logic was copied from the ConditionalFactDiscoverer but this is wrong.
For ActiveIssue we want to skip the test if the condition is true, rather than the other way round.

In dotnet#5376 the logic was copied from the ConditionalFactDiscoverer but this is wrong.
For ActiveIssue we want to _skip_ the test if the condition is true, rather than the other way round.
@akoeplinger akoeplinger merged commit 46fe554 into dotnet:master Jul 3, 2020
@akoeplinger akoeplinger deleted the fix-activeissue branch July 3, 2020 16:48
akoeplinger added a commit to akoeplinger/runtime that referenced this pull request Jul 3, 2020
The property only checked for the `MONO_ENV_OPTIONS=--interpreter` env var which isn't set on WebAssembly.

This needed an arcade fix to correct an inverted condition in the ActiveIssue discoverer: dotnet/arcade#5744
akoeplinger added a commit to dotnet/runtime that referenced this pull request Jul 3, 2020
The property only checked for the `MONO_ENV_OPTIONS=--interpreter` env var which isn't set on WebAssembly.

This needed an arcade fix to correct an inverted condition in the ActiveIssue discoverer: dotnet/arcade#5744
ViktorHofer pushed a commit to dotnet/winforms that referenced this pull request Dec 5, 2022
…time#38768)

The property only checked for the `MONO_ENV_OPTIONS=--interpreter` env var which isn't set on WebAssembly.

This needed an arcade fix to correct an inverted condition in the ActiveIssue discoverer: dotnet/arcade#5744

Commit migrated from dotnet/runtime@4aea0a1
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants