Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add edit, delete and reaction support to code review comments on issue page #14339

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jan 17, 2021

Conversation

lafriks
Copy link
Member

@lafriks lafriks commented Jan 14, 2021

Screenshot:
image

@lafriks lafriks added the type/enhancement An improvement of existing functionality label Jan 14, 2021
@lafriks lafriks added this to the 1.14.0 milestone Jan 14, 2021
@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Jan 14, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #14339 (ec82ba3) into master (acb1ceb) will increase coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 53.84%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master   #14339   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   41.84%   41.84%           
=======================================
  Files         744      744           
  Lines       79714    79727   +13     
=======================================
+ Hits        33355    33362    +7     
- Misses      40852    40856    +4     
- Partials     5507     5509    +2     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
routers/repo/issue.go 38.36% <53.84%> (+0.12%) ⬆️
modules/log/event.go 58.96% <0.00%> (-0.95%) ⬇️
models/repo_list.go 78.76% <0.00%> (+0.88%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update acb1ceb...ec82ba3. Read the comment docs.

@GiteaBot GiteaBot added the lgtm/need 2 This PR needs two approvals by maintainers to be considered for merging. label Jan 14, 2021
@GiteaBot GiteaBot added lgtm/need 1 This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged. and removed lgtm/need 2 This PR needs two approvals by maintainers to be considered for merging. labels Jan 17, 2021
@GiteaBot GiteaBot added lgtm/done This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore. and removed lgtm/need 1 This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged. labels Jan 17, 2021
@lafriks
Copy link
Member Author

lafriks commented Jan 17, 2021

🚀

@lafriks lafriks merged commit ca63a9d into go-gitea:master Jan 17, 2021
@lafriks lafriks deleted the feat/review_comments branch January 17, 2021 17:29
KN4CK3R added a commit to KN4CK3R/gitea that referenced this pull request Jan 17, 2021
a1012112796 added a commit to a1012112796/gitea that referenced this pull request Jan 19, 2021
* master: (27 commits)
  Use path not filepath in routers/editor (go-gitea#14390)
  Display error if twofaSecret cannot be retrieved (go-gitea#14372)
  Check if label template exist first (go-gitea#14384)
  Allow passcode invalid error to appear (go-gitea#14371)
  exclude authored PRs from Review Requested filter (go-gitea#14368)
  Upgrade blevesearch dependency to v2.0.1 (go-gitea#14346)
  Implement ghost comment mitigation (go-gitea#14349)
  Add edit, delete and reaction support to code review comments on issue page (go-gitea#14339)
  Add review requested filter on pull request overview (go-gitea#13701)
  escape branch names in compare url (go-gitea#14364)
  label and milestone webhooks on issue/pull creation (go-gitea#14363)
  Fix middlewares sequences (go-gitea#14354)
  Sort issue search results by revelance (go-gitea#14353)
  KanBan: be able to set default board (go-gitea#14147)
  ...
@go-gitea go-gitea locked and limited conversation to collaborators Mar 11, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
lgtm/done This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore. type/enhancement An improvement of existing functionality
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants