Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: ignore atomic primops on ARM architectures (GHC 8.8.3) #857

Conversation

michivi
Copy link
Contributor

@michivi michivi commented Sep 29, 2020

Fixes the #441 issue with GHC 8.8.3 (fix that was already applied to GHC 8.6.5 with PR #480).

Testing environment:

  • GHC 8.8.3 (cross-compiler)
  • NixOS 20.03
  • Building host: x86_64
  • Target host: armv6l

Without this PR, the symbol __sync_val_compare_and_swap_8 was not found by remote-iserv as described in #441 but this time with GHC 8.8.3. The 8.6.5 patch also works for 8.8.3. Perhaps it would be preferable to apply this patch to a range of GHC versions rather than specific versions, but I have only tested it and verified that it works properly on those specific versions.

I have not submitted this patch to the GHC GitLab as I haven't encountered any problem building a cross-compiling version of GHC from there.

@hamishmack hamishmack merged commit ef6ca0f into input-output-hk:master Oct 14, 2020
booniepepper pushed a commit to booniepepper/haskell.nix that referenced this pull request Feb 4, 2022
…tput-hk#857)

Fixes the input-output-hk#441 issue with GHC 8.8.3 (fix that was already applied to GHC 8.6.5 with PR input-output-hk#480).

Testing environment:

- GHC 8.8.3 (cross-compiler)
- NixOS 20.03
- Building host: x86_64
- Target host: armv6l

Without this PR, the symbol `__sync_val_compare_and_swap_8` was not found by `remote-iserv` as described in input-output-hk#441 but this time with GHC 8.8.3. The 8.6.5 patch also works for 8.8.3. Perhaps it would be preferable to apply this patch to a range of GHC versions rather than specific versions, but I have only tested it and verified that it works properly on those specific versions.

I have not submitted this patch to the GHC GitLab as I haven't encountered any problem building a cross-compiling version of GHC from there.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants