Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

holepunch: fix incorrect message type for the SYNC message, release v0.19.2 #1479

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 11, 2022
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
21 changes: 13 additions & 8 deletions p2p/protocol/holepunch/holepunch_test.go
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -112,8 +112,9 @@ func TestDirectDialWorks(t *testing.T) {
}

func TestEndToEndSimConnect(t *testing.T) {
tr := &mockEventTracer{}
h1, h2, relay, _ := makeRelayedHosts(t, nil, holepunch.WithTracer(tr), true)
h1tr := &mockEventTracer{}
h2tr := &mockEventTracer{}
h1, h2, relay, _ := makeRelayedHosts(t, holepunch.WithTracer(h1tr), holepunch.WithTracer(h2tr), true)
defer h1.Close()
defer h2.Close()
defer relay.Close()
Expand All @@ -122,18 +123,22 @@ func TestEndToEndSimConnect(t *testing.T) {
ensureDirectConn(t, h1, h2)
// ensure no hole-punching streams are open on either side
ensureNoHolePunchingStream(t, h1, h2)
var events []*holepunch.Event
var h2Events []*holepunch.Event
require.Eventually(t,
func() bool {
events = tr.getEvents()
return len(events) == 3
h2Events = h2tr.getEvents()
return len(h2Events) == 3
},
time.Second,
10*time.Millisecond,
)
require.Equal(t, events[0].Type, holepunch.StartHolePunchEvtT)
require.Equal(t, events[1].Type, holepunch.HolePunchAttemptEvtT)
require.Equal(t, events[2].Type, holepunch.EndHolePunchEvtT)
require.Equal(t, holepunch.StartHolePunchEvtT, h2Events[0].Type)
require.Equal(t, holepunch.HolePunchAttemptEvtT, h2Events[1].Type)
require.Equal(t, holepunch.EndHolePunchEvtT, h2Events[2].Type)
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should you check if it was successful here? (by checking this field maybe:

Success: err == nil,
)

Or do you just care that this attempt happened and not necessarily that it was successful?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good idea. Let's fix this on master though, not in this backport.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actually, on this peer's side Success will be true even if it just sent the CONNECT instead of the SYNC message.

h1Events := h1tr.getEvents()
require.Len(t, h1Events, 2)
require.Equal(t, holepunch.StartHolePunchEvtT, h1Events[0].Type)
require.Equal(t, holepunch.HolePunchAttemptEvtT, h1Events[1].Type)
}

func TestFailuresOnInitiator(t *testing.T) {
Expand Down
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion p2p/protocol/holepunch/holepuncher.go
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -228,7 +228,7 @@ func (hp *holePuncher) initiateHolePunchImpl(str network.Stream) ([]ma.Multiaddr
return nil, 0, errors.New("didn't receive any public addresses in CONNECT")
}

if err := w.WriteMsg(&pb.HolePunch{Type: pb.HolePunch_CONNECT.Enum()}); err != nil {
if err := w.WriteMsg(&pb.HolePunch{Type: pb.HolePunch_SYNC.Enum()}); err != nil {
return nil, 0, fmt.Errorf("failed to send SYNC message for hole punching: %w", err)
}
return addrs, rtt, nil
Expand Down
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion version.json
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
{
"version": "v0.19.1"
"version": "v0.19.2"
}