[package-extractor]Add dependencies configurations field in package extractor

[EscapeB]

Summary

Add "dependenciesConfigurations" field in options.
Related discussion in #4210

Details

1. Provide "dependenciesConfigurations" field in options to configure behavior when extracting third party dependencies.
2. Add similar fields named "patternToInclude" and "patternToExclude" to filter files inside third party dependencies.

How it was tested

Added some unit test cases to test the new field.

[EscapeB]

Hi @D4N14L, could you please help to review this PR?

[D4N14L]

I just merged my PR which should address your concerns: #4259

I'm a bit iffy on adding general 3rd party pattern include/exclude support given that it's a bit ambiguous if it applies only to the version of the package consumed directly by a project, or another dependency, or otherwise. The original issue should be addressed by my PR though.

[EscapeB]

I just merged my PR which should address your concerns: #4259

I'm a bit iffy on adding general 3rd party pattern include/exclude support given that it's a bit ambiguous if it applies only to the version of the package consumed directly by a project, or another dependency, or otherwise. The original issue should be addressed by my PR though.

I will rebase my branch~

But seems this PR can't solve my original issue, the symlink(which linked to global path) inside third party dependencies still cause errors :(

[EscapeB]

Hi @D4N14L , what I need to do if I want to get this PR merged?

[D4N14L]

@EscapeB I'm so sorry that I've let this slide. I've been pretty busy of late and just haven't had a chance to take a closer look. Plan on doing so tomorrow when I can find a moment. Again, apologies for holding this up.

[D4N14L]

Looking good! Just a few more changes then I think it's good to merge.

[EscapeB]

Looking good! Just a few more changes then I think it's good to merge.

Hi @D4N14L, I think all the changes mentioned in the comments have now been made, please help merge this PR when you have time.