Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor(http-client-csharp): do not flatten property in emitter #4449

Conversation

archerzz
Copy link
Member

Per discussion, we thought we should not flatten properties in emitter, to keep it as simple as possible.
The flattening logic should be implemented in generator.

part of Azure/autorest.csharp#4788

Per discussion, we thought we should not flatten properties in emitter, to keep it as simple as possible.
The flattening logic should be implemented in generator.

part of Azure/autorest.csharp#4788
@microsoft-github-policy-service microsoft-github-policy-service bot added the emitter:client:csharp Issue for the C# client emitter: @typespec/http-client-csharp label Sep 14, 2024
@archerzz
Copy link
Member Author

Do not merge. It requires subsequent changes in autorest.csharp.

@azure-sdk
Copy link
Collaborator

azure-sdk commented Sep 14, 2024

API change check

APIView has identified API level changes in this PR and created following API reviews.

Microsoft.Generator.CSharp.Input

…mitter

# Conflicts:
#	packages/http-client-csharp/emitter/src/lib/converter.ts
@archerzz
Copy link
Member Author

Do not merge. It requires subsequent changes in autorest.csharp.

OK. Subsequent PR is ready: Azure/autorest.csharp#5094

@archerzz archerzz added this pull request to the merge queue Oct 9, 2024
Merged via the queue into microsoft:main with commit c78c614 Oct 9, 2024
21 checks passed
@archerzz archerzz deleted the http-client-csharp/not-flatten-property-in-emitter branch October 9, 2024 08:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
emitter:client:csharp Issue for the C# client emitter: @typespec/http-client-csharp
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants