Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

selftests: mptcp_join.sh: "multi subflows, fair usage on close" is unstable #257

Closed
matttbe opened this issue Jan 31, 2022 · 0 comments
Closed

Comments

@matttbe
Copy link
Member

matttbe commented Jan 31, 2022

Hello,

I just noticed my CI was complaining about another test from mptcp_join.sh: 5 recent jobs mentioned issues with this multi subflows, fair usage on close test.

# 11 multi subflows, fair usage on close  syn[fail] got 0 JOIN[s] syn expected 1
#  - synack[fail] got 0 JOIN[s] synack expected 1
#  - ack[fail] got 0 JOIN[s] ack expected 1
# Server ns stats
# TcpPassiveOpens                 1                  0.0
# TcpInSegs                       49                 0.0
# TcpOutSegs                      31                 0.0
# TcpExtTW                        1                  0.0
# TcpExtTCPPureAcks               25                 0.0
# TcpExtTCPOrigDataSent           23                 0.0
# TcpExtTCPDelivered              23                 0.0
# MPTcpExtMPCapableSYNRX          1                  0.0
# MPTcpExtMPCapableACKRX          1                  0.0
# Client ns stats
# TcpActiveOpens                  2                  0.0
# TcpAttemptFails                 1                  0.0
# TcpInSegs                       31                 0.0
# TcpOutSegs                      50                 0.0
# TcpRetransSegs                  1                  0.0
# TcpExtLockDroppedIcmps          1                  0.0
# TcpExtDelayedACKs               14                 0.0
# TcpExtTCPPureAcks               7                  0.0
# TcpExtTCPTimeouts               1                  0.0
# TcpExtTCPSynRetrans             1                  0.0
# TcpExtTCPOrigDataSent           23                 0.0
# TcpExtTCPDelivered              24                 0.0
# TcpExtTcpTimeoutRehash          1                  0.0
# MPTcpExtMPCapableSYNTX          1                  0.0
# MPTcpExtMPCapableSYNACKRX       1                  0.0

It started on the 26th of Jan 2022. It was OK on the 27th but not the other days. Happening with both a debug and a non debug kernel.
The last patches specific to MPTCP have been applied on the 20th. This build and the two next ones didn't have the issue. On that day, 2 series have been applied: set flags and selftests + selftests: mptcp: add invert check in check_transfer (but not used) from @geliangtang. Maybe linked?

fengguang pushed a commit to 0day-ci/linux that referenced this issue Feb 4, 2022
The mentioned tests has to wait for a subflow creation failure.
The current code looks for TCP sockets in TW state and sometimes
misses the relevant event. Switch to a more stable check, looking
for the associated mib counter.

Closes: multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next#257
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
matttbe pushed a commit that referenced this issue Feb 5, 2022
The mentioned tests has to wait for a subflow creation failure.
The current code looks for TCP sockets in TW state and sometimes
misses the relevant event. Switch to a more stable check, looking
for the associated mib counter.

Fixes: 46e967d ("selftests: mptcp: add tests for subflow creation failure")
Closes: #257
Reported-and-tested-by: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@tessares.net>
Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
@matttbe matttbe closed this as completed in f0e1f9c Feb 5, 2022
jenkins-tessares pushed a commit that referenced this issue Feb 6, 2022
The mentioned tests has to wait for a subflow creation failure.
The current code looks for TCP sockets in TW state and sometimes
misses the relevant event. Switch to a more stable check, looking
for the associated mib counter.

Fixes: 46e967d ("selftests: mptcp: add tests for subflow creation failure")
Closes: #257
Reported-and-tested-by: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@tessares.net>
Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
jenkins-tessares pushed a commit that referenced this issue Feb 7, 2022
The mentioned tests has to wait for a subflow creation failure.
The current code looks for TCP sockets in TW state and sometimes
misses the relevant event. Switch to a more stable check, looking
for the associated mib counter.

Fixes: 46e967d ("selftests: mptcp: add tests for subflow creation failure")
Closes: #257
Reported-and-tested-by: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@tessares.net>
Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
jenkins-tessares pushed a commit that referenced this issue Feb 8, 2022
The mentioned tests has to wait for a subflow creation failure.
The current code looks for TCP sockets in TW state and sometimes
misses the relevant event. Switch to a more stable check, looking
for the associated mib counter.

Fixes: 46e967d ("selftests: mptcp: add tests for subflow creation failure")
Closes: #257
Reported-and-tested-by: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@tessares.net>
Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
matttbe pushed a commit that referenced this issue Feb 8, 2022
The mentioned tests has to wait for a subflow creation failure.
The current code looks for TCP sockets in TW state and sometimes
misses the relevant event. Switch to a more stable check, looking
for the associated mib counter.

Fixes: 46e967d ("selftests: mptcp: add tests for subflow creation failure")
Closes: #257
Reported-and-tested-by: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@tessares.net>
Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
matttbe pushed a commit that referenced this issue Feb 8, 2022
The mentioned tests has to wait for a subflow creation failure.
The current code looks for TCP sockets in TW state and sometimes
misses the relevant event. Switch to a more stable check, looking
for the associated mib counter.

Fixes: 46e967d ("selftests: mptcp: add tests for subflow creation failure")
Closes: #257
Reported-and-tested-by: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@tessares.net>
Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
matttbe pushed a commit that referenced this issue Feb 8, 2022
The mentioned tests has to wait for a subflow creation failure.
The current code looks for TCP sockets in TW state and sometimes
misses the relevant event. Switch to a more stable check, looking
for the associated mib counter.

Fixes: 46e967d ("selftests: mptcp: add tests for subflow creation failure")
Closes: #257
Reported-and-tested-by: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@tessares.net>
Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
matttbe pushed a commit that referenced this issue Feb 8, 2022
The mentioned tests has to wait for a subflow creation failure.
The current code looks for TCP sockets in TW state and sometimes
misses the relevant event. Switch to a more stable check, looking
for the associated mib counter.

Fixes: 46e967d ("selftests: mptcp: add tests for subflow creation failure")
Closes: #257
Reported-and-tested-by: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@tessares.net>
Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
jenkins-tessares pushed a commit that referenced this issue Feb 9, 2022
The mentioned tests has to wait for a subflow creation failure.
The current code looks for TCP sockets in TW state and sometimes
misses the relevant event. Switch to a more stable check, looking
for the associated mib counter.

Fixes: 46e967d ("selftests: mptcp: add tests for subflow creation failure")
Closes: #257
Reported-and-tested-by: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@tessares.net>
Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
matttbe pushed a commit that referenced this issue Feb 9, 2022
The mentioned tests has to wait for a subflow creation failure.
The current code looks for TCP sockets in TW state and sometimes
misses the relevant event. Switch to a more stable check, looking
for the associated mib counter.

Fixes: 46e967d ("selftests: mptcp: add tests for subflow creation failure")
Closes: #257
Reported-and-tested-by: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@tessares.net>
Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
matttbe pushed a commit that referenced this issue Feb 9, 2022
The mentioned tests has to wait for a subflow creation failure.
The current code looks for TCP sockets in TW state and sometimes
misses the relevant event. Switch to a more stable check, looking
for the associated mib counter.

Fixes: 46e967d ("selftests: mptcp: add tests for subflow creation failure")
Closes: #257
Reported-and-tested-by: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@tessares.net>
Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
matttbe pushed a commit that referenced this issue Feb 9, 2022
The mentioned tests has to wait for a subflow creation failure.
The current code looks for TCP sockets in TW state and sometimes
misses the relevant event. Switch to a more stable check, looking
for the associated mib counter.

Fixes: 46e967d ("selftests: mptcp: add tests for subflow creation failure")
Closes: #257
Reported-and-tested-by: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@tessares.net>
Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
matttbe pushed a commit that referenced this issue Feb 10, 2022
The mentioned tests has to wait for a subflow creation failure.
The current code looks for TCP sockets in TW state and sometimes
misses the relevant event. Switch to a more stable check, looking
for the associated mib counter.

Fixes: 46e967d ("selftests: mptcp: add tests for subflow creation failure")
Closes: #257
Reported-and-tested-by: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@tessares.net>
Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
matttbe pushed a commit that referenced this issue Feb 10, 2022
The mentioned tests has to wait for a subflow creation failure.
The current code looks for TCP sockets in TW state and sometimes
misses the relevant event. Switch to a more stable check, looking
for the associated mib counter.

Fixes: 46e967d ("selftests: mptcp: add tests for subflow creation failure")
Closes: #257
Reported-and-tested-by: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@tessares.net>
Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
matttbe pushed a commit that referenced this issue Feb 10, 2022
The mentioned tests has to wait for a subflow creation failure.
The current code looks for TCP sockets in TW state and sometimes
misses the relevant event. Switch to a more stable check, looking
for the associated mib counter.

Fixes: 46e967d ("selftests: mptcp: add tests for subflow creation failure")
Closes: #257
Reported-and-tested-by: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@tessares.net>
Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
matttbe pushed a commit that referenced this issue Feb 10, 2022
The mentioned tests has to wait for a subflow creation failure.
The current code looks for TCP sockets in TW state and sometimes
misses the relevant event. Switch to a more stable check, looking
for the associated mib counter.

Fixes: 46e967d ("selftests: mptcp: add tests for subflow creation failure")
Closes: #257
Reported-and-tested-by: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@tessares.net>
Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
matttbe pushed a commit that referenced this issue Feb 10, 2022
The mentioned tests has to wait for a subflow creation failure.
The current code looks for TCP sockets in TW state and sometimes
misses the relevant event. Switch to a more stable check, looking
for the associated mib counter.

Fixes: 46e967d ("selftests: mptcp: add tests for subflow creation failure")
Closes: #257
Reported-and-tested-by: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@tessares.net>
Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
jenkins-tessares pushed a commit that referenced this issue Feb 11, 2022
The mentioned tests has to wait for a subflow creation failure.
The current code looks for TCP sockets in TW state and sometimes
misses the relevant event. Switch to a more stable check, looking
for the associated mib counter.

Fixes: 46e967d ("selftests: mptcp: add tests for subflow creation failure")
Closes: #257
Reported-and-tested-by: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@tessares.net>
Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
matttbe pushed a commit that referenced this issue Feb 11, 2022
The mentioned tests has to wait for a subflow creation failure.
The current code looks for TCP sockets in TW state and sometimes
misses the relevant event. Switch to a more stable check, looking
for the associated mib counter.

Fixes: 46e967d ("selftests: mptcp: add tests for subflow creation failure")
Closes: #257
Reported-and-tested-by: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@tessares.net>
Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
matttbe pushed a commit that referenced this issue Feb 11, 2022
The mentioned tests has to wait for a subflow creation failure.
The current code looks for TCP sockets in TW state and sometimes
misses the relevant event. Switch to a more stable check, looking
for the associated mib counter.

Fixes: 46e967d ("selftests: mptcp: add tests for subflow creation failure")
Closes: #257
Reported-and-tested-by: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@tessares.net>
Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
matttbe pushed a commit that referenced this issue Feb 11, 2022
The mentioned tests has to wait for a subflow creation failure.
The current code looks for TCP sockets in TW state and sometimes
misses the relevant event. Switch to a more stable check, looking
for the associated mib counter.

Fixes: 46e967d ("selftests: mptcp: add tests for subflow creation failure")
Closes: #257
Reported-and-tested-by: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@tessares.net>
Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
jenkins-tessares pushed a commit that referenced this issue Feb 12, 2022
The mentioned tests has to wait for a subflow creation failure.
The current code looks for TCP sockets in TW state and sometimes
misses the relevant event. Switch to a more stable check, looking
for the associated mib counter.

Fixes: 46e967d ("selftests: mptcp: add tests for subflow creation failure")
Closes: #257
Reported-and-tested-by: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@tessares.net>
Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
jenkins-tessares pushed a commit that referenced this issue Feb 14, 2022
The mentioned tests has to wait for a subflow creation failure.
The current code looks for TCP sockets in TW state and sometimes
misses the relevant event. Switch to a more stable check, looking
for the associated mib counter.

Fixes: 46e967d ("selftests: mptcp: add tests for subflow creation failure")
Closes: #257
Reported-and-tested-by: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@tessares.net>
Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
jenkins-tessares pushed a commit that referenced this issue Feb 15, 2022
The mentioned tests has to wait for a subflow creation failure.
The current code looks for TCP sockets in TW state and sometimes
misses the relevant event. Switch to a more stable check, looking
for the associated mib counter.

Fixes: 46e967d ("selftests: mptcp: add tests for subflow creation failure")
Closes: #257
Reported-and-tested-by: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@tessares.net>
Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
ammarfaizi2 pushed a commit to ammarfaizi2/linux-block that referenced this issue Feb 19, 2022
The mentioned test has to wait for a subflow creation failure.
The current code looks for TCP sockets in TW state and sometimes
misses the relevant event. Switch to a more stable check, looking
for the associated mib counter.

Fixes: 46e967d ("selftests: mptcp: add tests for subflow creation failure")
Closes: multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next#257
Reported-and-tested-by: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@tessares.net>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
matttbe pushed a commit that referenced this issue Feb 19, 2022
The mentioned tests has to wait for a subflow creation failure.
The current code looks for TCP sockets in TW state and sometimes
misses the relevant event. Switch to a more stable check, looking
for the associated mib counter.

Fixes: 46e967d ("selftests: mptcp: add tests for subflow creation failure")
Closes: #257
Reported-and-tested-by: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@tessares.net>
Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
matttbe pushed a commit that referenced this issue Feb 19, 2022
The mentioned tests has to wait for a subflow creation failure.
The current code looks for TCP sockets in TW state and sometimes
misses the relevant event. Switch to a more stable check, looking
for the associated mib counter.

Fixes: 46e967d ("selftests: mptcp: add tests for subflow creation failure")
Closes: #257
Reported-and-tested-by: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@tessares.net>
Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
matttbe pushed a commit that referenced this issue Feb 19, 2022
The mentioned tests has to wait for a subflow creation failure.
The current code looks for TCP sockets in TW state and sometimes
misses the relevant event. Switch to a more stable check, looking
for the associated mib counter.

Fixes: 46e967d ("selftests: mptcp: add tests for subflow creation failure")
Closes: #257
Reported-and-tested-by: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@tessares.net>
Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
matttbe pushed a commit that referenced this issue Feb 19, 2022
The mentioned tests has to wait for a subflow creation failure.
The current code looks for TCP sockets in TW state and sometimes
misses the relevant event. Switch to a more stable check, looking
for the associated mib counter.

Fixes: 46e967d ("selftests: mptcp: add tests for subflow creation failure")
Closes: #257
Reported-and-tested-by: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@tessares.net>
Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
matttbe pushed a commit that referenced this issue Feb 19, 2022
The mentioned tests has to wait for a subflow creation failure.
The current code looks for TCP sockets in TW state and sometimes
misses the relevant event. Switch to a more stable check, looking
for the associated mib counter.

Fixes: 46e967d ("selftests: mptcp: add tests for subflow creation failure")
Closes: #257
Reported-and-tested-by: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@tessares.net>
Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
matttbe pushed a commit that referenced this issue Feb 19, 2022
The mentioned tests has to wait for a subflow creation failure.
The current code looks for TCP sockets in TW state and sometimes
misses the relevant event. Switch to a more stable check, looking
for the associated mib counter.

Fixes: 46e967d ("selftests: mptcp: add tests for subflow creation failure")
Closes: #257
Reported-and-tested-by: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@tessares.net>
Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
jenkins-tessares pushed a commit that referenced this issue Feb 20, 2022
The mentioned tests has to wait for a subflow creation failure.
The current code looks for TCP sockets in TW state and sometimes
misses the relevant event. Switch to a more stable check, looking
for the associated mib counter.

Fixes: 46e967d ("selftests: mptcp: add tests for subflow creation failure")
Closes: #257
Reported-and-tested-by: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@tessares.net>
Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
jenkins-tessares pushed a commit that referenced this issue Feb 21, 2022
The mentioned tests has to wait for a subflow creation failure.
The current code looks for TCP sockets in TW state and sometimes
misses the relevant event. Switch to a more stable check, looking
for the associated mib counter.

Fixes: 46e967d ("selftests: mptcp: add tests for subflow creation failure")
Closes: #257
Reported-and-tested-by: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@tessares.net>
Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
matttbe pushed a commit that referenced this issue Feb 21, 2022
The mentioned tests has to wait for a subflow creation failure.
The current code looks for TCP sockets in TW state and sometimes
misses the relevant event. Switch to a more stable check, looking
for the associated mib counter.

Fixes: 46e967d ("selftests: mptcp: add tests for subflow creation failure")
Closes: #257
Reported-and-tested-by: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@tessares.net>
Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
jenkins-tessares pushed a commit that referenced this issue Feb 22, 2022
The mentioned tests has to wait for a subflow creation failure.
The current code looks for TCP sockets in TW state and sometimes
misses the relevant event. Switch to a more stable check, looking
for the associated mib counter.

Fixes: 46e967d ("selftests: mptcp: add tests for subflow creation failure")
Closes: #257
Reported-and-tested-by: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@tessares.net>
Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
matttbe pushed a commit that referenced this issue Feb 22, 2022
The mentioned tests has to wait for a subflow creation failure.
The current code looks for TCP sockets in TW state and sometimes
misses the relevant event. Switch to a more stable check, looking
for the associated mib counter.

Fixes: 46e967d ("selftests: mptcp: add tests for subflow creation failure")
Closes: #257
Reported-and-tested-by: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@tessares.net>
Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
jenkins-tessares pushed a commit that referenced this issue Feb 23, 2022
The mentioned tests has to wait for a subflow creation failure.
The current code looks for TCP sockets in TW state and sometimes
misses the relevant event. Switch to a more stable check, looking
for the associated mib counter.

Fixes: 46e967d ("selftests: mptcp: add tests for subflow creation failure")
Closes: #257
Reported-and-tested-by: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@tessares.net>
Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
matttbe pushed a commit that referenced this issue Feb 23, 2022
The mentioned tests has to wait for a subflow creation failure.
The current code looks for TCP sockets in TW state and sometimes
misses the relevant event. Switch to a more stable check, looking
for the associated mib counter.

Fixes: 46e967d ("selftests: mptcp: add tests for subflow creation failure")
Closes: #257
Reported-and-tested-by: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@tessares.net>
Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
matttbe pushed a commit that referenced this issue Feb 23, 2022
The mentioned tests has to wait for a subflow creation failure.
The current code looks for TCP sockets in TW state and sometimes
misses the relevant event. Switch to a more stable check, looking
for the associated mib counter.

Fixes: 46e967d ("selftests: mptcp: add tests for subflow creation failure")
Closes: #257
Reported-and-tested-by: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@tessares.net>
Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
jenkins-tessares pushed a commit that referenced this issue Feb 24, 2022
The mentioned tests has to wait for a subflow creation failure.
The current code looks for TCP sockets in TW state and sometimes
misses the relevant event. Switch to a more stable check, looking
for the associated mib counter.

Fixes: 46e967d ("selftests: mptcp: add tests for subflow creation failure")
Closes: #257
Reported-and-tested-by: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@tessares.net>
Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
matttbe pushed a commit that referenced this issue Feb 24, 2022
The mentioned tests has to wait for a subflow creation failure.
The current code looks for TCP sockets in TW state and sometimes
misses the relevant event. Switch to a more stable check, looking
for the associated mib counter.

Fixes: 46e967d ("selftests: mptcp: add tests for subflow creation failure")
Closes: #257
Reported-and-tested-by: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@tessares.net>
Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
matttbe pushed a commit that referenced this issue Feb 24, 2022
The mentioned tests has to wait for a subflow creation failure.
The current code looks for TCP sockets in TW state and sometimes
misses the relevant event. Switch to a more stable check, looking
for the associated mib counter.

Fixes: 46e967d ("selftests: mptcp: add tests for subflow creation failure")
Closes: #257
Reported-and-tested-by: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@tessares.net>
Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
DorianRudolph pushed a commit to DorianRudolph/linux that referenced this issue Mar 21, 2022
The mentioned test has to wait for a subflow creation failure.
The current code looks for TCP sockets in TW state and sometimes
misses the relevant event. Switch to a more stable check, looking
for the associated mib counter.

Fixes: 46e967d ("selftests: mptcp: add tests for subflow creation failure")
Closes: multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next#257
Reported-and-tested-by: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@tessares.net>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
jenkins-tessares pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jul 15, 2022
…one()

The subpage we calculate is an invalid pointer for device private pages,
because device private pages are mapped via non-present device private
entries, not ordinary present PTEs.

Let's just not compute broken pointers and fixup later.  Move the proper
assignment of the correct subpage to the beginning of the function and
assert that we really only have a single page in our folio.

This currently results in a BUG when tying to compute anon_exclusive,
because:

[  528.727237] BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffffea1fffffffc0
[  528.739585] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
[  528.745324] #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
[  528.751062] PGD 44eaf2067 P4D 44eaf2067 PUD 0
[  528.756026] Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI
[  528.760890] CPU: 120 PID: 18275 Comm: hmm-tests Not tainted 5.19.0-rc3-kfd-alex #257
[  528.769542] Hardware name: AMD Corporation BardPeak/BardPeak, BIOS RTY1002BDS 09/17/2021
[  528.778579] RIP: 0010:try_to_migrate_one+0x21a/0x1000
[  528.784225] Code: f6 48 89 c8 48 2b 05 45 d1 6a 01 48 c1 f8 06 48 29
c3 48 8b 45 a8 48 c1 e3 06 48 01 cb f6 41 18 01 48 89 85 50 ff ff ff 74
0b <4c> 8b 33 49 c1 ee 11 41 83 e6 01 48 8b bd 48 ff ff ff e8 3f 99 02
[  528.805194] RSP: 0000:ffffc90003cdfaa0 EFLAGS: 00010202
[  528.811027] RAX: 00007ffff7ff4000 RBX: ffffea1fffffffc0 RCX: ffffeaffffffffc0
[  528.818995] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffffc90003cdfaf8
[  528.826962] RBP: ffffc90003cdfb70 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
[  528.834930] R10: ffffc90003cdf910 R11: 0000000000000002 R12: ffff888194450540
[  528.842899] R13: ffff888160d057c0 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 03ffffffffffffff
[  528.850865] FS:  00007ffff7fdb740(0000) GS:ffff8883b0600000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[  528.859891] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[  528.866308] CR2: ffffea1fffffffc0 CR3: 00000001562b4003 CR4: 0000000000770ee0
[  528.874275] PKRU: 55555554
[  528.877286] Call Trace:
[  528.880016]  <TASK>
[  528.882356]  ? lock_is_held_type+0xdf/0x130
[  528.887033]  rmap_walk_anon+0x167/0x410
[  528.891316]  try_to_migrate+0x90/0xd0
[  528.895405]  ? try_to_unmap_one+0xe10/0xe10
[  528.900074]  ? anon_vma_ctor+0x50/0x50
[  528.904260]  ? put_anon_vma+0x10/0x10
[  528.908347]  ? invalid_mkclean_vma+0x20/0x20
[  528.913114]  migrate_vma_setup+0x5f4/0x750
[  528.917691]  dmirror_devmem_fault+0x8c/0x250 [test_hmm]
[  528.923532]  do_swap_page+0xac0/0xe50
[  528.927623]  ? __lock_acquire+0x4b2/0x1ac0
[  528.932199]  __handle_mm_fault+0x949/0x1440
[  528.936876]  handle_mm_fault+0x13f/0x3e0
[  528.941256]  do_user_addr_fault+0x215/0x740
[  528.945928]  exc_page_fault+0x75/0x280
[  528.950115]  asm_exc_page_fault+0x27/0x30
[  528.954593] RIP: 0033:0x40366b
...

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220623205332.319257-1-david@redhat.com
Fixes: 6c28760 ("mm: remember exclusively mapped anonymous pages with PG_anon_exclusive")
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reported-by: "Sierra Guiza, Alejandro (Alex)" <alex.sierra@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
jenkins-tessares pushed a commit that referenced this issue Aug 11, 2023
Add a detachment test case with miniq present to assert that with and
without the miniq we get the same error.

  # ./test_progs -t tc_opts
  #244     tc_opts_after:OK
  #245     tc_opts_append:OK
  #246     tc_opts_basic:OK
  #247     tc_opts_before:OK
  #248     tc_opts_chain_classic:OK
  #249     tc_opts_delete_empty:OK
  #250     tc_opts_demixed:OK
  #251     tc_opts_detach:OK
  #252     tc_opts_detach_after:OK
  #253     tc_opts_detach_before:OK
  #254     tc_opts_dev_cleanup:OK
  #255     tc_opts_invalid:OK
  #256     tc_opts_mixed:OK
  #257     tc_opts_prepend:OK
  #258     tc_opts_replace:OK
  #259     tc_opts_revision:OK
  Summary: 16/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230804131112.11012-2-daniel@iogearbox.net
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
matttbe pushed a commit that referenced this issue Aug 17, 2023
Add several new tcx test cases to improve test coverage. This also includes
a few new tests with ingress instead of clsact qdisc, to cover the fix from
commit dc644b5 ("tcx: Fix splat in ingress_destroy upon tcx_entry_free").

  # ./test_progs -t tc
  [...]
  #234     tc_links_after:OK
  #235     tc_links_append:OK
  #236     tc_links_basic:OK
  #237     tc_links_before:OK
  #238     tc_links_chain_classic:OK
  #239     tc_links_chain_mixed:OK
  #240     tc_links_dev_cleanup:OK
  #241     tc_links_dev_mixed:OK
  #242     tc_links_ingress:OK
  #243     tc_links_invalid:OK
  #244     tc_links_prepend:OK
  #245     tc_links_replace:OK
  #246     tc_links_revision:OK
  #247     tc_opts_after:OK
  #248     tc_opts_append:OK
  #249     tc_opts_basic:OK
  #250     tc_opts_before:OK
  #251     tc_opts_chain_classic:OK
  #252     tc_opts_chain_mixed:OK
  #253     tc_opts_delete_empty:OK
  #254     tc_opts_demixed:OK
  #255     tc_opts_detach:OK
  #256     tc_opts_detach_after:OK
  #257     tc_opts_detach_before:OK
  #258     tc_opts_dev_cleanup:OK
  #259     tc_opts_invalid:OK
  #260     tc_opts_mixed:OK
  #261     tc_opts_prepend:OK
  #262     tc_opts_replace:OK
  #263     tc_opts_revision:OK
  [...]
  Summary: 44/38 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/8699efc284b75ccdc51ddf7062fa2370330dc6c0.1692029283.git.daniel@iogearbox.net
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
jenkins-tessares pushed a commit that referenced this issue Oct 6, 2023
Add various tests to check maximum number of supported programs
being attached:

  # ./vmtest.sh -- ./test_progs -t tc_opts
  [...]
  ./test_progs -t tc_opts
  [    1.185325] bpf_testmod: loading out-of-tree module taints kernel.
  [    1.186826] bpf_testmod: module verification failed: signature and/or required key missing - tainting kernel
  [    1.270123] tsc: Refined TSC clocksource calibration: 3407.988 MHz
  [    1.272428] clocksource: tsc: mask: 0xffffffffffffffff max_cycles: 0x311fc932722, max_idle_ns: 440795381586 ns
  [    1.276408] clocksource: Switched to clocksource tsc
  #252     tc_opts_after:OK
  #253     tc_opts_append:OK
  #254     tc_opts_basic:OK
  #255     tc_opts_before:OK
  #256     tc_opts_chain_classic:OK
  #257     tc_opts_chain_mixed:OK
  #258     tc_opts_delete_empty:OK
  #259     tc_opts_demixed:OK
  #260     tc_opts_detach:OK
  #261     tc_opts_detach_after:OK
  #262     tc_opts_detach_before:OK
  #263     tc_opts_dev_cleanup:OK
  #264     tc_opts_invalid:OK
  #265     tc_opts_max:OK              <--- (new test)
  #266     tc_opts_mixed:OK
  #267     tc_opts_prepend:OK
  #268     tc_opts_replace:OK
  #269     tc_opts_revision:OK
  Summary: 18/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230929204121.20305-2-daniel@iogearbox.net
jenkins-tessares pushed a commit that referenced this issue Oct 13, 2023
Add a new test case which performs double query of the bpf_mprog through
libbpf API, but also via raw bpf(2) syscall. This is testing to gather
first the count and then in a subsequent probe the full information with
the program array without clearing passed structs in between.

  # ./vmtest.sh -- ./test_progs -t tc_opts
  [...]
  ./test_progs -t tc_opts
  [    1.398818] tsc: Refined TSC clocksource calibration: 3407.999 MHz
  [    1.400263] clocksource: tsc: mask: 0xffffffffffffffff max_cycles: 0x311fd336761, max_idle_ns: 440795243819 ns
  [    1.402734] clocksource: Switched to clocksource tsc
  [    1.426639] bpf_testmod: loading out-of-tree module taints kernel.
  [    1.428112] bpf_testmod: module verification failed: signature and/or required key missing - tainting kernel
  #252     tc_opts_after:OK
  #253     tc_opts_append:OK
  #254     tc_opts_basic:OK
  #255     tc_opts_before:OK
  #256     tc_opts_chain_classic:OK
  #257     tc_opts_chain_mixed:OK
  #258     tc_opts_delete_empty:OK
  #259     tc_opts_demixed:OK
  #260     tc_opts_detach:OK
  #261     tc_opts_detach_after:OK
  #262     tc_opts_detach_before:OK
  #263     tc_opts_dev_cleanup:OK
  #264     tc_opts_invalid:OK
  #265     tc_opts_max:OK
  #266     tc_opts_mixed:OK
  #267     tc_opts_prepend:OK
  #268     tc_opts_query:OK            <--- (new test)
  #269     tc_opts_replace:OK
  #270     tc_opts_revision:OK
  Summary: 19/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231006220655.1653-4-daniel@iogearbox.net
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
jenkins-tessares pushed a commit that referenced this issue Oct 13, 2023
Add a new test case to query on an empty bpf_mprog and pass the revision
directly into expected_revision for attachment to assert that this does
succeed.

  ./test_progs -t tc_opts
  [    1.406778] tsc: Refined TSC clocksource calibration: 3407.990 MHz
  [    1.408863] clocksource: tsc: mask: 0xffffffffffffffff max_cycles: 0x311fcaf6eb0, max_idle_ns: 440795321766 ns
  [    1.412419] clocksource: Switched to clocksource tsc
  [    1.428671] bpf_testmod: loading out-of-tree module taints kernel.
  [    1.430260] bpf_testmod: module verification failed: signature and/or required key missing - tainting kernel
  #252     tc_opts_after:OK
  #253     tc_opts_append:OK
  #254     tc_opts_basic:OK
  #255     tc_opts_before:OK
  #256     tc_opts_chain_classic:OK
  #257     tc_opts_chain_mixed:OK
  #258     tc_opts_delete_empty:OK
  #259     tc_opts_demixed:OK
  #260     tc_opts_detach:OK
  #261     tc_opts_detach_after:OK
  #262     tc_opts_detach_before:OK
  #263     tc_opts_dev_cleanup:OK
  #264     tc_opts_invalid:OK
  #265     tc_opts_max:OK
  #266     tc_opts_mixed:OK
  #267     tc_opts_prepend:OK
  #268     tc_opts_query:OK
  #269     tc_opts_query_attach:OK     <--- (new test)
  #270     tc_opts_replace:OK
  #271     tc_opts_revision:OK
  Summary: 20/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231006220655.1653-6-daniel@iogearbox.net
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
matttbe pushed a commit that referenced this issue Oct 27, 2023
Add several new test cases which assert corner cases on the mprog query
mechanism, for example, around passing in a too small or a larger array
than the current count.

  ./test_progs -t tc_opts
  #252     tc_opts_after:OK
  #253     tc_opts_append:OK
  #254     tc_opts_basic:OK
  #255     tc_opts_before:OK
  #256     tc_opts_chain_classic:OK
  #257     tc_opts_chain_mixed:OK
  #258     tc_opts_delete_empty:OK
  #259     tc_opts_demixed:OK
  #260     tc_opts_detach:OK
  #261     tc_opts_detach_after:OK
  #262     tc_opts_detach_before:OK
  #263     tc_opts_dev_cleanup:OK
  #264     tc_opts_invalid:OK
  #265     tc_opts_max:OK
  #266     tc_opts_mixed:OK
  #267     tc_opts_prepend:OK
  #268     tc_opts_query:OK
  #269     tc_opts_query_attach:OK
  #270     tc_opts_replace:OK
  #271     tc_opts_revision:OK
  Summary: 20/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231017081728.24769-1-daniel@iogearbox.net
matttbe pushed a commit that referenced this issue Oct 27, 2023
Add a bigger batch of test coverage to assert correct operation of
netkit devices and their BPF program management:

  # ./test_progs -t tc_netkit
  [...]
  [    1.166267] bpf_testmod: loading out-of-tree module taints kernel.
  [    1.166831] bpf_testmod: module verification failed: signature and/or required key missing - tainting kernel
  [    1.270957] tsc: Refined TSC clocksource calibration: 3407.988 MHz
  [    1.272579] clocksource: tsc: mask: 0xffffffffffffffff max_cycles: 0x311fc932722, max_idle_ns: 440795381586 ns
  [    1.275336] clocksource: Switched to clocksource tsc
  #257     tc_netkit_basic:OK
  #258     tc_netkit_device:OK
  #259     tc_netkit_multi_links:OK
  #260     tc_netkit_multi_opts:OK
  #261     tc_netkit_neigh_links:OK
  Summary: 5/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
  [...]

Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231024214904.29825-8-daniel@iogearbox.net
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
matttbe pushed a commit that referenced this issue Dec 1, 2023
hid_debug_events_release releases resources bound to the HID device instance.
hid_device_release releases the underlying HID device instance potentially
before hid_debug_events_release has completed releasing debug resources bound
to the same HID device instance.

Reference count to prevent the HID device instance from being torn down
preemptively when HID debugging support is used. When count reaches zero,
release core resources of HID device instance using hiddev_free.

The crash:

[  120.728477][ T4396] kernel BUG at lib/list_debug.c:53!
[  120.728505][ T4396] Internal error: Oops - BUG: 0 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
[  120.739806][ T4396] Modules linked in: bcmdhd dhd_static_buf 8822cu pcie_mhi r8168
[  120.747386][ T4396] CPU: 1 PID: 4396 Comm: hidt_bridge Not tainted 5.10.110 #257
[  120.754771][ T4396] Hardware name: Rockchip RK3588 EVB4 LP4 V10 Board (DT)
[  120.761643][ T4396] pstate: 60400089 (nZCv daIf +PAN -UAO -TCO BTYPE=--)
[  120.768338][ T4396] pc : __list_del_entry_valid+0x98/0xac
[  120.773730][ T4396] lr : __list_del_entry_valid+0x98/0xac
[  120.779120][ T4396] sp : ffffffc01e62bb60
[  120.783126][ T4396] x29: ffffffc01e62bb60 x28: ffffff818ce3a200
[  120.789126][ T4396] x27: 0000000000000009 x26: 0000000000980000
[  120.795126][ T4396] x25: ffffffc012431000 x24: ffffff802c6d4e00
[  120.801125][ T4396] x23: ffffff8005c66f00 x22: ffffffc01183b5b8
[  120.807125][ T4396] x21: ffffff819df2f100 x20: 0000000000000000
[  120.813124][ T4396] x19: ffffff802c3f0700 x18: ffffffc01d2cd058
[  120.819124][ T4396] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000
[  120.825124][ T4396] x15: 0000000000000004 x14: 0000000000003fff
[  120.831123][ T4396] x13: ffffffc012085588 x12: 0000000000000003
[  120.837123][ T4396] x11: 00000000ffffbfff x10: 0000000000000003
[  120.843123][ T4396] x9 : 455103d46b329300 x8 : 455103d46b329300
[  120.849124][ T4396] x7 : 74707572726f6320 x6 : ffffffc0124b8cb5
[  120.855124][ T4396] x5 : ffffffffffffffff x4 : 0000000000000000
[  120.861123][ T4396] x3 : ffffffc011cf4f90 x2 : ffffff81fee7b948
[  120.867122][ T4396] x1 : ffffffc011cf4f90 x0 : 0000000000000054
[  120.873122][ T4396] Call trace:
[  120.876259][ T4396]  __list_del_entry_valid+0x98/0xac
[  120.881304][ T4396]  hid_debug_events_release+0x48/0x12c
[  120.886617][ T4396]  full_proxy_release+0x50/0xbc
[  120.891323][ T4396]  __fput+0xdc/0x238
[  120.895075][ T4396]  ____fput+0x14/0x24
[  120.898911][ T4396]  task_work_run+0x90/0x148
[  120.903268][ T4396]  do_exit+0x1bc/0x8a4
[  120.907193][ T4396]  do_group_exit+0x8c/0xa4
[  120.911458][ T4396]  get_signal+0x468/0x744
[  120.915643][ T4396]  do_signal+0x84/0x280
[  120.919650][ T4396]  do_notify_resume+0xd0/0x218
[  120.924262][ T4396]  work_pending+0xc/0x3f0

[ Rahul Rameshbabu <sergeantsagara@protonmail.com>: rework changelog ]
Fixes: cd667ce ("HID: use debugfs for events/reports dumping")
Signed-off-by: Charles Yi <be286@163.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
cpaasch pushed a commit that referenced this issue Dec 4, 2023
[ Upstream commit fc43e9c ]

hid_debug_events_release releases resources bound to the HID device instance.
hid_device_release releases the underlying HID device instance potentially
before hid_debug_events_release has completed releasing debug resources bound
to the same HID device instance.

Reference count to prevent the HID device instance from being torn down
preemptively when HID debugging support is used. When count reaches zero,
release core resources of HID device instance using hiddev_free.

The crash:

[  120.728477][ T4396] kernel BUG at lib/list_debug.c:53!
[  120.728505][ T4396] Internal error: Oops - BUG: 0 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
[  120.739806][ T4396] Modules linked in: bcmdhd dhd_static_buf 8822cu pcie_mhi r8168
[  120.747386][ T4396] CPU: 1 PID: 4396 Comm: hidt_bridge Not tainted 5.10.110 #257
[  120.754771][ T4396] Hardware name: Rockchip RK3588 EVB4 LP4 V10 Board (DT)
[  120.761643][ T4396] pstate: 60400089 (nZCv daIf +PAN -UAO -TCO BTYPE=--)
[  120.768338][ T4396] pc : __list_del_entry_valid+0x98/0xac
[  120.773730][ T4396] lr : __list_del_entry_valid+0x98/0xac
[  120.779120][ T4396] sp : ffffffc01e62bb60
[  120.783126][ T4396] x29: ffffffc01e62bb60 x28: ffffff818ce3a200
[  120.789126][ T4396] x27: 0000000000000009 x26: 0000000000980000
[  120.795126][ T4396] x25: ffffffc012431000 x24: ffffff802c6d4e00
[  120.801125][ T4396] x23: ffffff8005c66f00 x22: ffffffc01183b5b8
[  120.807125][ T4396] x21: ffffff819df2f100 x20: 0000000000000000
[  120.813124][ T4396] x19: ffffff802c3f0700 x18: ffffffc01d2cd058
[  120.819124][ T4396] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000
[  120.825124][ T4396] x15: 0000000000000004 x14: 0000000000003fff
[  120.831123][ T4396] x13: ffffffc012085588 x12: 0000000000000003
[  120.837123][ T4396] x11: 00000000ffffbfff x10: 0000000000000003
[  120.843123][ T4396] x9 : 455103d46b329300 x8 : 455103d46b329300
[  120.849124][ T4396] x7 : 74707572726f6320 x6 : ffffffc0124b8cb5
[  120.855124][ T4396] x5 : ffffffffffffffff x4 : 0000000000000000
[  120.861123][ T4396] x3 : ffffffc011cf4f90 x2 : ffffff81fee7b948
[  120.867122][ T4396] x1 : ffffffc011cf4f90 x0 : 0000000000000054
[  120.873122][ T4396] Call trace:
[  120.876259][ T4396]  __list_del_entry_valid+0x98/0xac
[  120.881304][ T4396]  hid_debug_events_release+0x48/0x12c
[  120.886617][ T4396]  full_proxy_release+0x50/0xbc
[  120.891323][ T4396]  __fput+0xdc/0x238
[  120.895075][ T4396]  ____fput+0x14/0x24
[  120.898911][ T4396]  task_work_run+0x90/0x148
[  120.903268][ T4396]  do_exit+0x1bc/0x8a4
[  120.907193][ T4396]  do_group_exit+0x8c/0xa4
[  120.911458][ T4396]  get_signal+0x468/0x744
[  120.915643][ T4396]  do_signal+0x84/0x280
[  120.919650][ T4396]  do_notify_resume+0xd0/0x218
[  120.924262][ T4396]  work_pending+0xc/0x3f0

[ Rahul Rameshbabu <sergeantsagara@protonmail.com>: rework changelog ]
Fixes: cd667ce ("HID: use debugfs for events/reports dumping")
Signed-off-by: Charles Yi <be286@163.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
matttbe pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jan 26, 2024
Currently when packet is shrunk via bpf_xdp_adjust_tail() and memory
type is set to MEM_TYPE_XSK_BUFF_POOL, null ptr dereference happens:

[1136314.192256] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address:
0000000000000034
[1136314.203943] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
[1136314.213768] #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
[1136314.223550] PGD 0 P4D 0
[1136314.230684] Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI
[1136314.239621] CPU: 8 PID: 54203 Comm: xdpsock Not tainted 6.6.0+ #257
[1136314.250469] Hardware name: Intel Corporation S2600WFT/S2600WFT,
BIOS SE5C620.86B.02.01.0008.031920191559 03/19/2019
[1136314.265615] RIP: 0010:__xdp_return+0x6c/0x210
[1136314.274653] Code: ad 00 48 8b 47 08 49 89 f8 a8 01 0f 85 9b 01 00 00 0f 1f 44 00 00 f0 41 ff 48 34 75 32 4c 89 c7 e9 79 cd 80 ff 83 fe 03 75 17 <f6> 41 34 01 0f 85 02 01 00 00 48 89 cf e9 22 cc 1e 00 e9 3d d2 86
[1136314.302907] RSP: 0018:ffffc900089f8db0 EFLAGS: 00010246
[1136314.312967] RAX: ffffc9003168aed0 RBX: ffff8881c3300000 RCX:
0000000000000000
[1136314.324953] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000003 RDI:
ffffc9003168c000
[1136314.336929] RBP: 0000000000000ae0 R08: 0000000000000002 R09:
0000000000010000
[1136314.348844] R10: ffffc9000e495000 R11: 0000000000000040 R12:
0000000000000001
[1136314.360706] R13: 0000000000000524 R14: ffffc9003168aec0 R15:
0000000000000001
[1136314.373298] FS:  00007f8df8bbcb80(0000) GS:ffff8897e0e00000(0000)
knlGS:0000000000000000
[1136314.386105] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[1136314.396532] CR2: 0000000000000034 CR3: 00000001aa912002 CR4:
00000000007706f0
[1136314.408377] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2:
0000000000000000
[1136314.420173] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7:
0000000000000400
[1136314.431890] PKRU: 55555554
[1136314.439143] Call Trace:
[1136314.446058]  <IRQ>
[1136314.452465]  ? __die+0x20/0x70
[1136314.459881]  ? page_fault_oops+0x15b/0x440
[1136314.468305]  ? exc_page_fault+0x6a/0x150
[1136314.476491]  ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x22/0x30
[1136314.484927]  ? __xdp_return+0x6c/0x210
[1136314.492863]  bpf_xdp_adjust_tail+0x155/0x1d0
[1136314.501269]  bpf_prog_ccc47ae29d3b6570_xdp_sock_prog+0x15/0x60
[1136314.511263]  ice_clean_rx_irq_zc+0x206/0xc60 [ice]
[1136314.520222]  ? ice_xmit_zc+0x6e/0x150 [ice]
[1136314.528506]  ice_napi_poll+0x467/0x670 [ice]
[1136314.536858]  ? ttwu_do_activate.constprop.0+0x8f/0x1a0
[1136314.546010]  __napi_poll+0x29/0x1b0
[1136314.553462]  net_rx_action+0x133/0x270
[1136314.561619]  __do_softirq+0xbe/0x28e
[1136314.569303]  do_softirq+0x3f/0x60

This comes from __xdp_return() call with xdp_buff argument passed as
NULL which is supposed to be consumed by xsk_buff_free() call.

To address this properly, in ZC case, a node that represents the frag
being removed has to be pulled out of xskb_list. Introduce
appropriate xsk helpers to do such node operation and use them
accordingly within bpf_xdp_adjust_tail().

Fixes: 24ea501 ("xsk: support mbuf on ZC RX")
Acked-by: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@intel.com> # For the xsk header part
Signed-off-by: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240124191602.566724-4-maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant