NETOBSERV-1882 test e2e faillure

[jpinsonneau]

Description

• added eBPF agents logs
• added collector trace logs
• updated kind version
• display kernel version

Dependencies

netobserv/netobserv-ebpf-agent#413

Checklist

If you are not familiar with our processes or don't know what to answer in the list below, let us know in a comment: the maintainers will take care of that.

• Is this PR backed with a JIRA ticket? If so, make sure it is written as a title prefix (in general, PRs affecting the NetObserv/Network Observability product should be backed with a JIRA ticket - especially if they bring user facing changes).
• Does this PR require product documentation?
  • If so, make sure the JIRA epic is labelled with "documentation" and provides a description relevant for doc writers, such as use cases or scenarios. Any required step to activate or configure the feature should be documented there, such as new CRD knobs.
• Does this PR require a product release notes entry?
  • If so, fill in "Release Note Text" in the JIRA.
• Is there anything else the QE team should know before testing? E.g: configuration changes, environment setup, etc.
  • If so, make sure it is described in the JIRA ticket.
• QE requirements (check 1 from the list):
  • Standard QE validation, with pre-merge tests unless stated otherwise.
  • Regression tests only (e.g. refactoring with no user-facing change).
  • No QE (e.g. trivial change with high reviewer's confidence, or per agreement with the QE team).

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 3.57143% with 54 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 25.10%. Comparing base (248df00) to head (06068df).
Report is 12 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
cmd/packet_capture.go	0.00%	17 Missing ⚠️
cmd/flow_capture.go	11.11%	16 Missing ⚠️
e2e/cluster/kind.go	0.00%	12 Missing ⚠️
cmd/root.go	0.00%	9 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #90      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   26.16%   25.10%   -1.06%     
==========================================
  Files           8        8              
  Lines        1093     1147      +54     
==========================================
+ Hits          286      288       +2     
- Misses        786      838      +52     
  Partials       21       21              

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	25.10% <3.57%> (-1.06%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
e2e/common.go	0.00% <ø> (ø)
cmd/root.go	47.61% <0.00%> (-12.99%)	⬇️
e2e/cluster/kind.go	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
cmd/flow_capture.go	31.73% <11.11%> (-1.08%)	⬇️
cmd/packet_capture.go	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)

[msherif1234]

do we need those changes since those features are irrelevant to pca ? just wanted to avoid any confusion if someone mistakenly enabled them ?

[jpinsonneau]

sure let's get rid of these

[jpinsonneau]

06068df

[msherif1234]

/lgtm

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

Approval requirements bypassed by manually added approval.

This pull-request has been approved by:

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment