rename "exposure event or process" to "exposure of organism" (issue 599)

[wdduncan]

• add exposure event class
• change domain of 'related via exposure to' to 'exposure event'
• obsolete 'exposure event or process'

[wdduncan]

Fixes #599

@matentzn @diatomsRcool @laurenechan @cmungall The goal of this PR is to fix the confusion created by having both exposure event and exposure event or process classes in ECTO.

It also relates to COB issue OBOFoundry/COB#192.
If COB mints a new IRI for exposure event, we may need to obsolete this class.

[cmungall]

We recommend the ECTO group mint an ID for exposure event for now, with the understanding it may be deprecated and replaced by a COB class eventually

We will then replace the usage of the current RO class in domains and ranges with the ECTO URI (and later with the COB URI)

[wdduncan]

COB has added the class exposure of organism (PR).
The class has not been added to a COB release (i.e., it is only in cob-edit.owl). I've submitted an issue concerning when COB will create a release.

[wdduncan]

@cmungall This is being held up b/c we are waiting on new release of COB. Are you the only one who release COB? Can you assign some else?

[github-actions]

This PR has not seen any activity in 90 days and has been marked as stale. If it is no longer needed, please close the PR. Otherwise, please update the PR with a status update.

[wdduncan]

Update: The COB class needed is ready. I just need to find the time to circle back to this.

[github-actions]

This PR has not seen any activity in 90 days and has been marked as stale. If it is no longer needed, please close the PR. Otherwise, please update the PR with a status update.

[wdduncan]

@anitacaron I've been holding of on this until the COB is ready so that I can use the COB class.

[anitacaron]

@wdduncan, Do you need help fixing the conflicts in the ro-edit.owl?

[wdduncan]

@anitacaron I don't think there will be any conflicts (I hope).
Now that exposure of organism is in COB, I think I just need to change the IRI for exposure event or process (and label) to match the COB class (which currently not in RO).

[anitacaron]

There's already a conflict in this branch, but I'll wait for you to add the COB term. Do you need help importing COB?

[wdduncan]

Just an update:
Waiting on #717 to complete before continuing on this. That PR has a COB import file that I will used to add the necessary class.

[anitacaron]

COB is already ready to use. It was merged in PR #736. I can fix the conflict in the edit file.

[wdduncan]

COB is already ready to use. It was merged in PR #736. I can fix the conflict in the edit file.

@anitacaron Your help would be greatly appreciated! :)

[github-actions]

This PR has not seen any activity in 90 days and has been marked as stale. If it is no longer needed, please close the PR. Otherwise, please update the PR with a status update.

[wdduncan]

This has been open for quite a while. I need to review to see what needs to be done in order to finish.

[wdduncan]

Still working on this.

[wdduncan]

We recommend the ECTO group mint an ID for exposure event for now, with the understanding it may be deprecated and replaced by a COB class eventually

We will then replace the usage of the current RO class in domains and ranges with the ECTO URI (and later with the COB URI)

@anitacaron @cmungall The IRI has been changed to COB_0001000 (from COB). Can we move forward now.

[wdduncan]

Label and IRI has been updated. Old creator annotation has been removed.
Can finish this up?

[github-actions]

This PR has not seen any activity in 90 days and has been marked as stale. If it is no longer needed, please close the PR. Otherwise, please update the PR with a status update.

[anitacaron]

Technically, it's approved. It still needs an ontology review.

[matentzn]

LGTM

Previous review from May 2022 was to hold this PR until COB term is available. I confirm the COB term was imported correctly in this PR.