Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix service deps for ovs-configuration #3361

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

cybertron
Copy link
Member

In #3233 we changed the order of dependencies for ovs-configuration and nodeip-configuration. However, because nodeip-configuration doesn't run everywhere, this means ovs-configuration lost its depenedency on NetworkManager-wait-online in some cases. Since the first patch merged, some upgrade jobs have been having issues that seem to be related to that change. It's not entirely clear why, but since this was an unintended change to the dependencies it seems like a strong candidate.

To fix the problem, we can just have the NetworkManager-wait-online dep in both services. When nodeip-configuration runs it will be redundant, but at least ovs-configuration will always wait for it.

- What I did

- How to verify it

- Description for the changelog

In openshift#3233 we changed the order of dependencies for ovs-configuration
and nodeip-configuration. However, because nodeip-configuration doesn't
run everywhere, this means ovs-configuration lost its depenedency on
NetworkManager-wait-online in some cases. Since the first patch
merged, some upgrade jobs have been having issues that seem to be
related to that change. It's not entirely clear why, but since this
was an unintended change to the dependencies it seems like a strong
candidate.

To fix the problem, we can just have the NetworkManager-wait-online
dep in both services. When nodeip-configuration runs it will be
redundant, but at least ovs-configuration will always wait for it.
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 3, 2022

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: cybertron
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign yuqi-zhang for approval by writing /assign @yuqi-zhang in a comment. For more information see:The Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@cybertron
Copy link
Member Author

/test e2e-azure-ovn-upgrade
/test e2e-azure-upgrade

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 3, 2022

@cybertron: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-azure-upgrade cff02c5 link false /test e2e-azure-upgrade
ci/prow/e2e-agnostic-upgrade cff02c5 link true /test e2e-agnostic-upgrade

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Oct 3, 2022
@openshift-merge-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@cybertron: PR needs rebase.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@cybertron
Copy link
Member Author

This is being done in #3362 now.

@cybertron cybertron closed this Oct 3, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants