Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor(semantic): should not add symbols of ClassExpression and FunctionExpression to the scope #4141

Conversation

Copy link

graphite-app bot commented Jul 9, 2024

Your org has enabled the Graphite merge queue for merging into main

Add the label “merge” to the PR and Graphite will automatically add it to the merge queue when it’s ready to merge. Or use the label “hotfix” to add to the merge queue as a hot fix.

You must have a Graphite account and log in to Graphite in order to use the merge queue. Sign up using this link.

Copy link
Member Author

Dunqing commented Jul 9, 2024

@github-actions github-actions bot added A-linter Area - Linter A-semantic Area - Semantic A-transformer Area - Transformer / Transpiler labels Jul 9, 2024
@Dunqing Dunqing marked this pull request as draft July 9, 2024 17:20
@Dunqing Dunqing force-pushed the 07-10-refactor_semantic_should_not_add_symbols_of_classexpression_and_functionexpression_to_the_scope branch from e5721da to adfebfa Compare July 9, 2024 17:25
Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Jul 9, 2024

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #4141 will degrade performances by 3.12%

Comparing 07-10-refactor_semantic_should_not_add_symbols_of_classexpression_and_functionexpression_to_the_scope (520d1f1) with 07-11-feat_semantic_align_class_scope_with_typescript (2634b62)

Summary

❌ 1 regressions
✅ 30 untouched benchmarks

⚠️ Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

Benchmarks breakdown

Benchmark 07-11-feat_semantic_align_class_scope_with_typescript 07-10-refactor_semantic_should_not_add_symbols_of_classexpression_and_functionexpression_to_the_scope Change
semantic[pdf.mjs] 32 ms 33 ms -3.12%

@Dunqing Dunqing force-pushed the 07-10-refactor_semantic_should_not_add_symbols_of_classexpression_and_functionexpression_to_the_scope branch from adfebfa to 9920171 Compare July 10, 2024 09:01
@Dunqing Dunqing changed the base branch from main to 07-10-refactor_semantic_add_strict_mode_in_scope_flags_for_class_definitions July 10, 2024 09:01
@Dunqing Dunqing force-pushed the 07-10-refactor_semantic_add_strict_mode_in_scope_flags_for_class_definitions branch from f676841 to e88e957 Compare July 10, 2024 16:14
@Dunqing Dunqing force-pushed the 07-10-refactor_semantic_should_not_add_symbols_of_classexpression_and_functionexpression_to_the_scope branch 5 times, most recently from a4e1a1a to 357ad9f Compare July 11, 2024 08:00
@Dunqing Dunqing changed the base branch from 07-10-refactor_semantic_add_strict_mode_in_scope_flags_for_class_definitions to 07-11-refactor_semantic_set_current_scope_id_to_scope_id_in_enter_scope July 11, 2024 08:00
@Dunqing Dunqing force-pushed the 07-10-refactor_semantic_should_not_add_symbols_of_classexpression_and_functionexpression_to_the_scope branch from 357ad9f to cbb7bfd Compare July 11, 2024 08:25
@Dunqing Dunqing changed the base branch from 07-11-refactor_semantic_set_current_scope_id_to_scope_id_in_enter_scope to 07-11-feat_semantic_align_class_scope_with_typescript July 11, 2024 08:25
@Dunqing Dunqing marked this pull request as ready for review July 11, 2024 08:25
@Dunqing Dunqing force-pushed the 07-11-feat_semantic_align_class_scope_with_typescript branch from f5a2d06 to 2634b62 Compare July 11, 2024 08:51
@Dunqing Dunqing force-pushed the 07-10-refactor_semantic_should_not_add_symbols_of_classexpression_and_functionexpression_to_the_scope branch from cbb7bfd to 520d1f1 Compare July 11, 2024 08:51
@Dunqing Dunqing force-pushed the 07-11-feat_semantic_align_class_scope_with_typescript branch from 2634b62 to 7fe477a Compare July 11, 2024 09:21
@Dunqing Dunqing force-pushed the 07-11-feat_semantic_align_class_scope_with_typescript branch from 7fe477a to 3f07793 Compare July 11, 2024 09:48
@Dunqing Dunqing closed this Jul 11, 2024
@Dunqing Dunqing mentioned this pull request Jul 12, 2024
@Boshen Boshen deleted the 07-10-refactor_semantic_should_not_add_symbols_of_classexpression_and_functionexpression_to_the_scope branch September 11, 2024 12:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-linter Area - Linter A-semantic Area - Semantic A-transformer Area - Transformer / Transpiler
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant