Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

planner: resolveFromPlan when tblName.colName exists in having clause (#18349) #18433

Closed

Conversation

ti-srebot
Copy link
Contributor

cherry-pick #18349 to release-3.1


What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #18384

Problem Summary:

What is changed and how it works?

What's Changed:
For SQL like select a+1 from t having t.a, we need to resolve it from the plan and select fields both.

How it Works:

Related changes

  • Need to cherry-pick to the release branch

Check List

Tests

  • Integration test

Side effects

N/A

Release note

  • Fix unknown column error for sql like select a from t having t.a

Signed-off-by: ti-srebot <ti-srebot@pingcap.com>
@ti-srebot
Copy link
Contributor Author

/run-all-tests

Comment on lines +1412 to +1415
<<<<<<< HEAD
if a.orderBy {
index, a.err = a.resolveFromSchema(v, a.p.Schema())
=======
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please resolve conflicts.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
sig/planner SIG: Planner type/bugfix This PR fixes a bug. type/3.1-cherry-pick
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants