Fix coverage

[kratman]

Description

Minor fix to the coverage tests

Fixes #3946

Type of change

• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)

Key checklist:

• No style issues: $ pre-commit run (or $ nox -s pre-commit) (see CONTRIBUTING.md for how to set this up to run automatically when committing locally, in just two lines of code)
• All tests pass: $ python run-tests.py --all (or $ nox -s tests)
• The documentation builds: $ python run-tests.py --doctest (or $ nox -s doctests)

You can run integration tests, unit tests, and doctests together at once, using $ python run-tests.py --quick (or $ nox -s quick).

Further checks:

• Code is commented, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
• Tests added that prove fix is effective or that feature works

[valentinsulzer]

thanks!

[agriyakhetarpal]

This is pretty confusing, it passes for me locally on macOS + Python 3.11. Not sure what is going on here

[kratman]

Not really sure, but it is all in the latex parsing. PyCharm also flags them

[kratman]

I would just scan with PyCharm, but it shows 30-50 warnings/errors per file. Too much to do all at once

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 99.58%. Comparing base (3b39e9b) to head (364f0a4).
Report is 2 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop    #3954   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    99.58%   99.58%           
========================================
  Files          257      257           
  Lines        21190    21196    +6     
========================================
+ Hits         21102    21108    +6     
  Misses          88       88           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[kratman]

@agriyakhetarpal can you rereview

[agriyakhetarpal]

much thanks, this was pretty tedious