Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rollup of 8 pull requests #69827

Closed
wants to merge 26 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

Centril
Copy link
Contributor

@Centril Centril commented Mar 8, 2020

Successful merges:

Failed merges:

r? @ghost

RalfJung and others added 26 commits March 2, 2020 10:13
Although `stack_overflow::init` runs very early in the process, even
before `main`, there may already be signal handlers installed for things
like the address sanitizer. In that case, just leave it alone, and don't
bother trying to allocate our own signal stacks either.
remove non-sysroot sources from rust-src component

See rust-lang#69592 (comment): these were likely added in rust-lang#58269 for the sake of compiler plugins, but those are being entirely phased out, so there is no good reason to ship these sources.

OTOH, @eddyb [wrote](rust-lang#58269 (comment))

> Yeah, my question is why librustc_plugin specifically? Everything else makes sense.

So maybe there is some good reason to keep these? Then we should have a comment explaining that reason.

Cc @eddyb @taeguk @Mark-Simulacrum
Miri visitor: detect primitive types based on type, not layout (also, more tests)

I also converted the union-based transmutes to use `mem::transmute` for increased readability.

r? @eddyb @oli-obk
…=eddyb

Try to ensure usize marker does not get merged

This follows up on [this conversation](rust-lang#69209 (comment)). However, I'm not confident this is quite correct, so feedback is appreciated, as always.
…, r=Mark-Simulacrum

More documentation and simplification of BTreeMap's internals

Salvage the documentation and simplification from rust-lang#67980, without changing the type locked down by debuginfo.

r? @rkruppe
unix: Don't override existing SIGSEGV/BUS handlers

Although `stack_overflow::init` runs very early in the process, even
before `main`, there may already be signal handlers installed for things
like the address sanitizer. In that case, just leave it alone, and don't
bother trying to allocate our own signal stacks either.

Fixes rust-lang#69524.
Add missing ` in doc for File::with_options()
Refactorings to method/probe.rs and CrateId

A couple of refactorings done while looking into performance improvements in method resolution.
@Centril Centril added the rollup A PR which is a rollup label Mar 8, 2020
@Centril
Copy link
Contributor Author

Centril commented Mar 8, 2020

@bors r+ p=1001 rollup=never

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 8, 2020

📌 Commit eb125f3 has been approved by Centril

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 8, 2020

🌲 The tree is currently closed for pull requests below priority 1000, this pull request will be tested once the tree is reopened

@bors bors added the S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. label Mar 8, 2020
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 8, 2020

⌛ Testing commit eb125f3 with merge 45b4fdb...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 8, 2020
Rollup of 8 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #69631 (remove non-sysroot sources from rust-src component)
 - #69646 (Miri visitor: detect primitive types based on type, not layout (also, more tests))
 - #69651 (Try to ensure usize marker does not get merged)
 - #69668 (More documentation and simplification of BTreeMap's internals)
 - #69685 (unix: Don't override existing SIGSEGV/BUS handlers)
 - #69771 (Cleanup E0390 explanation)
 - #69777 (Add missing ` in doc for File::with_options())
 - #69812 (Refactorings to method/probe.rs and CrateId)

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

The job dist-x86_64-apple of your PR failed (pretty log, raw log). Through arcane magic we have determined that the following fragments from the build log may contain information about the problem.

Click to expand the log.
2020-03-08T15:48:40.6206330Z   local time: Sun Mar  8 15:48:40 UTC 2020
2020-03-08T15:48:40.6744460Z   network time: Sun, 08 Mar 2020 15:48:40 GMT
2020-03-08T15:48:40.6846510Z == end clock drift check ==
2020-03-08T15:48:40.6903970Z 
2020-03-08T15:48:40.6948060Z ##[error]Bash exited with code '1'.
2020-03-08T15:48:40.7029620Z ##[section]Starting: Checkout rust-lang/rust@auto to s
2020-03-08T15:48:40.7036610Z ==============================================================================
2020-03-08T15:48:40.7037040Z Task         : Get sources
2020-03-08T15:48:40.7037460Z Description  : Get sources from a repository. Supports Git, TfsVC, and SVN repositories.

I'm a bot! I can only do what humans tell me to, so if this was not helpful or you have suggestions for improvements, please ping or otherwise contact @rust-lang/infra. (Feature Requests)

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 8, 2020

💔 Test failed - checks-azure

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Mar 8, 2020
@Centril Centril closed this Mar 8, 2020
@Centril Centril deleted the rollup-jlfos3x branch March 8, 2020 15:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants