Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

B 20943 INT #13568

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Aug 29, 2024
Merged

B 20943 INT #13568

merged 9 commits into from
Aug 29, 2024

Conversation

CoryKleinjanCACI
Copy link
Contributor

@CoryKleinjanCACI CoryKleinjanCACI commented Aug 26, 2024

B-20943

B-20944

B-20945

Summary

Fixes improper use of the SIT estimated entry and departure dates instead of actual dates on payment packets. Also fixed issue where days in storage was calculated using estimated instead of actual dates for SIT on payment packets.

Verification Steps for the Author

These are to be checked by the author.

  • Tested in the Experimental environment (for changes to containers, app startup, or connection to data stores)
  • Have the Agility acceptance criteria been met for this change?

Verification Steps for Reviewers

These are to be checked by a reviewer.

  • Has the branch been pulled in and checked out?
  • Have the BL acceptance criteria been met for this change?
  • Was the CircleCI build successful?
  • Has the code been reviewed from a standards and best practices point of view?

Setup to Run the Code

How to test

  1. Access the Milmove application
  2. Login as a customer
  3. Create a PPM, ensure that it has storage planned
  4. Submit the PPM
  5. Login as a Service Counselor
  6. Submit move details for your created move
  7. Login as the Customer you create the PPM for
  8. Upload documents and enter Storage Expense details for the PPM (pick different actual dates that estimated dates entered previously for ease of testing)
  9. Login as a Service Counselor
  10. Review the documents and approve the storage
  11. Login as the Customer
  12. Download the Payment Packet
  13. Ensure the Actual dates listed on the Storage Expense object are used on the packet, and not the estimated dates
  14. Login as a Service Counselor
  15. Locate the PPM you created
  16. Download the Payment Packet
  17. Ensure the Actual dates listed on the Storage Expense object are used on the packet, and not the estimated dates

Frontend

  • There are no aXe warnings for UI.
  • This works in Supported Browsers and their phone views (Chrome, Firefox, Edge).
  • There are no new console errors in the browser devtools.
  • There are no new console errors in the test output.
  • If this PR adds a new component to Storybook, it ensures the component is fully responsive, OR if it is intentionally not, a wrapping div using the officeApp class or custom min-width styling is used to hide any states the would not be visible to the user.
  • This change meets the standards for Section 508 compliance.

Backend

Database

Any new migrations/schema changes:

  • Follows our guidelines for Zero-Downtime Deploys.
  • Have been communicated to #g-database.
  • Secure migrations have been tested following the instructions in our docs.

Screenshots

@CoryKleinjanCACI CoryKleinjanCACI requested a review from a team as a code owner August 26, 2024 19:05
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Aug 26, 2024

⚠️ The sha of the head commit of this PR conflicts with #12044. Mergify cannot evaluate rules on this PR. ⚠️

@CoryKleinjanCACI CoryKleinjanCACI changed the base branch from main to integrationTesting August 26, 2024 19:07
@CoryKleinjanCACI CoryKleinjanCACI self-assigned this Aug 27, 2024
@CoryKleinjanCACI CoryKleinjanCACI added Scrummy Bears Scrum Team H INTEGRATION Slated for Integration Testing labels Aug 27, 2024
@r-mettler
Copy link
Contributor

Verified packet is using the actual dates and not estimated for Customer and SC.

Copy link
Contributor

@r-mettler r-mettler left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good

Copy link
Contributor

@MInthavongsay MInthavongsay left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Tests passed.

@CoryKleinjanCACI CoryKleinjanCACI merged commit 21f9881 into integrationTesting Aug 29, 2024
30 checks passed
@CoryKleinjanCACI CoryKleinjanCACI deleted the B-20943-INt branch August 29, 2024 14:47
@CoryKleinjanCACI CoryKleinjanCACI restored the B-20943-INt branch September 4, 2024 13:32
@antgmann antgmann mentioned this pull request Sep 4, 2024
7 tasks
@CoryKleinjanCACI CoryKleinjanCACI mentioned this pull request Sep 11, 2024
17 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
INTEGRATION Slated for Integration Testing Scrummy Bears Scrum Team H
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants