Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Performance of target matching #1199

Closed
BoPeng opened this issue Jan 30, 2019 · 3 comments
Closed

Performance of target matching #1199

BoPeng opened this issue Jan 30, 2019 · 3 comments

Comments

@BoPeng
Copy link
Contributor

BoPeng commented Jan 30, 2019

This ticket is dedicated to performance of target resolving

case 1:

[BAM]
output: [f'a_{i}.bam' for i in range(1000)]
_output.touch()

[default]
input: [f'a_{i}.bam' for i in range(1000)]
print('ok')
@BoPeng
Copy link
Contributor Author

BoPeng commented Jan 30, 2019

case 2:

[BAM: provides='{filename}.bam']
_output.touch()

[default]
input: [f'a_{i}.bam' for i in range(1000)]
print('ok')

@BoPeng
Copy link
Contributor Author

BoPeng commented Jan 30, 2019

case 3: existing file with -T turned on

[default]
input: [f'a_{i}.bam' for i in range(1000)]
print('ok')

@BoPeng
Copy link
Contributor Author

BoPeng commented Jan 30, 2019

Filename matching is reasonably fast.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant