Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

modifies MD0D test to use unit test harness #1368

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Apr 25, 2024

Conversation

ElmiraShamlou
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes/Resolves:

(replace this with the issue # fixed or resolved, if no issue exists then a brief statement of what this PR does)

Summary/Motivation:

Changes proposed in this PR:

Legal Acknowledgement

By contributing to this software project, I agree to the following terms and conditions for my contribution:

  1. I agree my contributions are submitted under the license terms described in the LICENSE.txt file at the top level of this directory.
  2. I represent I am authorized to make the contributions and grant the license. If my employer has rights to intellectual property that includes these contributions, I represent that I have received permission to make contributions and grant the required license on behalf of that employer.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 24, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 93.82%. Comparing base (b22f995) to head (15a1a0f).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1368      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   93.83%   93.82%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         338      338              
  Lines       35354    35354              
==========================================
- Hits        33174    33172       -2     
- Misses       2180     2182       +2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Comment on lines -62 to +63
self.default_absolute_tolerance = 1e-12
self.default_relative_tolerance = 1e-6
self.default_absolute_tolerance = 1e-5
self.default_relative_tolerance = 1e-3
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Same comment as #1367 (comment). Are these tolerances reasonable? If so, I think this and #1367 are good-to-go. If not, then we would need to address why some of the solutions fail at lower tolerances.

Copy link
Contributor

@MarcusHolly MarcusHolly left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@ksbeattie ksbeattie added the Priority:Normal Normal Priority Issue or PR label Apr 25, 2024
@ksbeattie ksbeattie merged commit 70f5203 into watertap-org:main Apr 25, 2024
26 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Priority:Normal Normal Priority Issue or PR
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants