-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 57
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Doc for second electrodialysis flowsheet #1386
Conversation
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1386 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 93.85% 93.85%
=======================================
Files 339 339
Lines 35931 35931
=======================================
Hits 33723 33723
Misses 2208 2208 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
A couple of minor things to address. Most of these comments also apply to #1385
Documentation for unit models from IDAES: | ||
* `Feed block <https://idaes-pse.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reference_guides/model_libraries/generic/unit_models/feed.html>`_ | ||
* `Separator <https://idaes-pse.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reference_guides/model_libraries/generic/unit_models/separator.html>`_ | ||
* `Product block <https://idaes-pse.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reference_guides/model_libraries/generic/unit_models/product.html>`_ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In other flowsheet documentation, we have not listed these IDAES models. Personally I think they can be left out since these will be present in almost every flowsheet, but I'm curious what others think.
Co-authored-by: MarcusHolly <96305519+MarcusHolly@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: MarcusHolly <96305519+MarcusHolly@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: MarcusHolly <96305519+MarcusHolly@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: MarcusHolly <96305519+MarcusHolly@users.noreply.github.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
One more minor typo, but I won't let this or the question of whether or not to include the IDAES models hold up my approval
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM just a small typo
Co-authored-by: agarciadiego <40575271+agarciadiego@users.noreply.github.com>
Fixes/Resolves:
check ED * @lbibl in #1219
Summary/Motivation:
As title
Legal Acknowledgement
By contributing to this software project, I agree to the following terms and conditions for my contribution: