Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(linter/eslint-plugin-vitest): implement no-restricted-vi-methods #4956

Merged

Conversation

shulaoda
Copy link
Contributor

Related to #4656

Copy link

graphite-app bot commented Aug 18, 2024

Your org has enabled the Graphite merge queue for merging into main

Add the label “merge” to the PR and Graphite will automatically add it to the merge queue when it’s ready to merge. Or use the label “hotfix” to add to the merge queue as a hot fix.

You must have a Graphite account and log in to Graphite in order to use the merge queue. Sign up using this link.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the A-linter Area - Linter label Aug 18, 2024
Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Aug 18, 2024

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #4956 will not alter performance

Comparing shulaoda:feat/vitest-no-restricted-test-methods (99a7007) with main (d69e34e)

Summary

✅ 29 untouched benchmarks

@shulaoda shulaoda force-pushed the feat/vitest-no-restricted-test-methods branch from 58a12b4 to f805797 Compare August 19, 2024 03:47
@DonIsaac DonIsaac added the C-enhancement Category - New feature or request label Aug 19, 2024
@mysteryven
Copy link
Member

These two rule's difference are trivial, can we combine them in one file?

https://github.com/oxc-project/oxc/pull/4182/files

What's more, the snapshot can be split by using with_snapshot_suffix.

@shulaoda
Copy link
Contributor Author

These two rule's difference are trivial, can we combine them in one file?

Where should we place the combined rules? jest or vitest? What should the combined name be?

@mysteryven
Copy link
Member

Where should we place the combined rules? jest or vitest? What should the combined name be?

The original jest rule file is ok. #4182 maybe helpful for you, the initial PR of this serial is #3717 👀

@shulaoda shulaoda force-pushed the feat/vitest-no-restricted-test-methods branch from f805797 to 50fe64c Compare August 21, 2024 07:46
@shulaoda shulaoda force-pushed the feat/vitest-no-restricted-test-methods branch from 1fdfd48 to 99a7007 Compare August 21, 2024 11:07
Copy link
Member

@mysteryven mysteryven left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you!

@mysteryven mysteryven merged commit 14bf5d5 into oxc-project:main Aug 22, 2024
27 checks passed
@shulaoda shulaoda deleted the feat/vitest-no-restricted-test-methods branch August 22, 2024 02:01
@oxc-bot oxc-bot mentioned this pull request Aug 23, 2024
Boshen added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 23, 2024
## [0.8.0] - 2024-08-23

- 5f4c9ab semantic: [**BREAKING**] Rename `SymbolTable::get_flag` to
`get_flags` (#5030) (overlookmotel)

- ce4d469 codegen: [**BREAKING**] Remove const generic `MINIFY` (#5001)
(Boshen)

- b2ff2df parser: [**BREAKING**] Remove builder pattern from `Parser`
struct (#5000) (Boshen)

- f88970b ast: [**BREAKING**] Change order of fields in CallExpression
(#4859) (Burlin)

### Features

- 2292606 linter: Typescript-eslint/no-wrapper-object-types (#5022)
(camc314)
- a0effab linter: Support more flexible config.globals values (#4990)
(Don Isaac)
- cdbfcfb linter: Start import fixer for eslint/no-unused-vars (#4849)
(DonIsaac)
- 915cb4d linter: Add dangerous fixer for oxc only used in recursion
(#4805) (camc314)
- 3f28c77 linter/eslint: Improve no-dupe-keys (#4943) (DonIsaac)
- e1582a5 linter/eslint: Improve no-duplicate-case rule (#4942)
(DonIsaac)
- f1e4611 linter/eslint-plugin-vitest: Implement no-conditional-in-test
(#4971) (dalaoshu)
- 14bf5d5 linter/eslint-plugin-vitest: Implement
no-restricted-vi-methods (#4956) (dalaoshu)
- ed9a1c4 linter/eslint-plugin-vitest: Implement
require-local-test-context-for-concurrent-snapshots (#4951) (dalaoshu)
- 7859f58 linter/eslint-plugin-vitest: Implement no-conditional-tests
(#4955) (dalaoshu)
- 841174f linter/no-unused-vars: Delete non-root arrows, skip `await`
(#5083) (Don Isaac)

### Bug Fixes

- 86d0c0c linter: Change consistent-function-scoping to suspicious
(#5010) (DonIsaac)
- 7b99386 linter: Missing closing ticks in some example blocks (#4994)
(DonIsaac)
- 9c64b12 linter: Improve no-zero-fractions rule for member expressions
and scientific notation (#4793) (Burlin)
- c43945c linter/consistent-function-scoping: Allow functions passed as
arguments (#5011) (Don Isaac)
- 9354779 linter/no-unused-vars: Give `argsIgnorePattern` the same
default behavior as `varsIgnorePattern` (#5018) (DonIsaac)
- 5a55dcf linter/no-unused-vars: `type` specifier not deleted for type
imports (#5029) (DonIsaac)
- 4081293 linter/no-unused-vars: Panic in fixer when removing
destructures (#4923) (Don Isaac)
- ddf83ff linter/react: Fixed false positive with missing key inside
React.Children.toArray() (#4945) (Earl Chase)
- 508644a linter/tree-shaking: Correct the calculation of `>>`, `<<` and
`>>>` (#4932) (mysteryven)
- e99836d linter/unicorn: Allow set spreading in no-useless-spread
(#4944) (Don Isaac)
- 5f8a7c2 oxlint: Rules in the configuration file are not being
correctly … (#4949) (dalaoshu)

### Documentation

- e331ca0 linter: Improve documentation for several rules (#4997)
(DonIsaac)
- cd9f1cd linter/consistent-function-scoping: Improve rule documentation
(#5015) (DonIsaac)

### Refactor

- eca6fdb linter: Move plugin options into separate struct (#5100)
(DonIsaac)
- 06f2d81 linter: Avoid unnecessary temp `Vec`s (#4963) (overlookmotel)
- 4cb8c37 linter: Move default_true to utils (#4947) (Don Isaac)
- ca70cc7 linter, mangler, parser, semantic, transformer, traverse,
wasm: Rename various `flag` vars to `flags` (#5028) (overlookmotel)
- 59d15c7 semantic: `root_unresolved_references` contain only
`ReferenceId` (#4959) (overlookmotel)

### Testing

- c21d735 linter/no-unused-vars: Add ignored destructuring test cases
(#4922) (Don Isaac)

Co-authored-by: Boshen <1430279+Boshen@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-linter Area - Linter C-enhancement Category - New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants