-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 606
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support generic spec inside facet #2760
Comments
I feel having a repeat could be a useful thing to have inside a facet. Admittedly, you could do the inverse: a repeat of a facet. Anyway, I would like to see some examples of how the output is unexpected and an argument that there aren't cases where you would want arbitrary composition. |
I think Repeat of facet is way better visualization than facet of repeat as
the latter would be extremely confusing for readers (non-creator).
…On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 6:57 PM Dominik Moritz ***@***.***> wrote:
I feel having a repeat could be a useful thing to have inside a facet.
Admittedly, you could do the inverse: a repeat of a facet. Anyway, I would
like to see some examples of how the output is unexpected and an argument
that there aren't cases where you would want arbitrary composition.
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#2760 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAGypcWihIx-htQXdm5kfOSNr4mYYcR9ks5sUnqOgaJpZM4OtFH8>
.
|
A while ago, I had created a facet of concat plots to see two different views of each facet. |
I think longer term we certainly should support all of them. However, currently there are some amount of corner cases that we do not support well.
So instead of delaying our release more, I'd rather support less things, but do them well. |
In #2977, we now limit facet to only have layer or unit inside. I'm changing this issue to become "Support generic spec inside facet" and move it out from 2.0 milestone. |
|
Here is a cool example of facet concat use case: https://observablehq.com/@john-guerra/california-covid-19-disparities-stacked-bars/2 |
The semantic of facet would not be what people expect.
(I'll provide more example soon)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: